Cases 1 - 10 of 31
(PC) James v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Tamu James
Defendant:
D. Gonzalez, A. Reilly, M. Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Marcel D. Ford v. Pitts
as 1:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Marcel D. Ford
Defendant:
Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Elliott v. Lynch et al
as 2:2022cv01323
Plaintiff:
Christopher Elliott
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, S. Leatherman, R. Ehlers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation Employees
as 3:2022cv04317
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Pitts
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Candler v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
Keith Candler
Defendant:
D. Gonzales, A. Reilly, M. Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Battles et al
as 5:2021cv04226
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Emanuel Jeremiah Pitts
Defendant:
Ellis and Battles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. West County Detention Facility Officer Battles
as 5:2021cv03723
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Emanuel Jeremiah Pitts
Defendant:
West County Detention Facility Officer Battles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Martinez Detention Facility Medical Staff, et al.
as 3:2021cv01846
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Emanuel Jeremiah Pitts
Defendant:
Martinez Detention Facility Medical Staff, Catuza, West County Detention Facility Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Lujuan et al
as 3:2021cv01841
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Emanuel Jeremiah Pitts
Defendant:
Lujuan and Cardinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ruiz v. Shearer et al
as 2:2020cv02078
Defendant:
M. Pitts, A. Shearer and K. Makena
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
