Cases 1 - 10 of 2,681
Smith v. Trinity Broadcasting of Texas, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Leah Smith
Defendant:
Trinity Broadcasting of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith et al
as 8:2024cv01048
Petitioner:
Leah Smith and Trinity Broadcasting of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Reno
as 24-3083
Petitioner:
LATONIA SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. Target Corporation
as 2:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
Kiloh Smith
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tafari v. Rucker, et al.
as 24-2842
Plaintiff:
RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI
Defendant:
YVETTE RUCKER, JULIE RANDALL, GARRY MOLER and others
Dwayne Amsterdam v. Martica Rochelle Smith
as 5:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Amsterdam
Defendant:
Martica Rochelle Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Gamboa, et al.
as 24-2790
Petitioner:
RONALD J. SMITH
Respondent:
MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden and ROB BONTA, Attorney General, State of California
Bailey v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2798
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BAILEY
Defendant:
MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MICHAEL REESE, CPT. ERIC P. SMITH and others
Char v. Smith, et al.
as 24-2805
Plaintiff:
MARK ALAN CHAR
Defendant:
ANTHONY SMITH, Police Officer, City and County of Honolulu, in his individual and official capacity, ASHLEY STIBBARD, Police Officer, City and County of Honolulu, in her individual and official capacity, ALAN LU, Police Officer, City and County of Honolulu, in his individual and official capacity and others
Smith Cordoba v. Garland
as 24-2644
Petitioner:
JIMMY ROBERTO SMITH CORDOBA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
