Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cook v. Pollan
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Christopher Casey Cook
Defendant:
Greg Pollan, Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, John Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Smith
as 3:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
Lance Whitaker
Respondent:
Donna M. Smith
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stilley v. Whitaker et al
as 3:2019cv00006
Defendant:
J. F. Caraway, Hugh Hurwitz, Warden M. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Stilley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Perkins v. Arnold et al
as 1:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lamar Perkins
Defendant:
Unknown Arnold, Unknown Reed, Unknown Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. Hood et al
as 1:2016cv00140
Petitioner:
Timmy Dale Whitaker
Defendant:
Jim Hood and Jacquline Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitaker v. Epps et al
as 1:2014cv00059
Plaintiff:
Timmy Whitaker
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Charles Rinehart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2013cv00242
Petitioner:
Timmy Dale Whitaker
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whitaker v. Rinehart et al
as 1:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Timmy Dale Whitaker
Defendant:
Charles Rinehart and Jeff Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Lee et al
as 1:2013cv00123
Petitioner:
Timmy Dale Whitaker
Respondent:
Earnest Lee and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitaker v. Rinehart et al
as 1:2009cv00196
Plaintiff:
Timmy Dale Whitaker
Defendant:
Charles Rinehart, Betty Strickland, Chris Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
