Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,513
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner: Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent: William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Stancil
as 24-1168
Petitioner: NORMAN WILLIAMS
Respondent: ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
Puana (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01088
Petitioner: Rudolph Puana
Respondent: J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams (PS) v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01107
Petitioner: Nathaniel Williams
Respondent: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. F. Williams, A. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff: Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant: Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00182
Petitioner: Marcell Jeron Norman
Respondent: William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mead v. Harding
as 24-7031
Petitioner: WILLIAM CLAUDE MEAD
Respondent: RANDY HARDING, Warden
Long et al v. Harrison
as 4:2024cv00165
Petitioner: Richard W Long, Richard William Long and Sheryl D Dorman
Respondent: Sharon Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Isbill v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6064
Plaintiff: GEORGE WILLIAM ISBILL
Defendant: KEVIN STITT, Governor, LARRY MORRIS, Pardon & parole Board member, ADAM LUCK, Pardon & parole Board member and others
Rodriguez (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00862
Petitioner: Nicolas Rodriguez
Respondent: J.F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?