Cases 11 - 20 of 549
IN RE: RICHARD WILLIAM NEUBAUER
as 1:2023cv01531
In Re:
RICHARD WILLIAM NEUBAUER
Plaintiff:
IN RE: RICHARD WILLIAM NEUBAUER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01141
Petitioner:
ANTHONY T. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Norris Williams v. DOJ
as 23-5082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Norris Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00913
Petitioner:
LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00778
Petitioner:
LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICES and CHARLOTTE LUCKSTONE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WILLIAMS v. U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and CHARLOTTE LUCKSTONE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
THORNE v. HOWELL et al
as 1:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
LINWOOD DOUGLAS THORNE
Respondent:
BERYL A. HOWELL, GREGORY PAUL ROSEN and MANUEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
