Cases 11 - 20 of 232
Lucero et al v. Coppinger et al
as 1:2023cv10088
Plaintiff:
Manuel Robert Lucero, V., Robert Blanchette, James Williams and others
Defendant:
Kevin Coppinger, George Glynos and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv12115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fischer v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv11611
Petitioner:
William Fischer
Respondent:
A. Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walsh v. Boncher
as 1:2022cv11197
Petitioner:
William Francis Walsh
Respondent:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boisvert v. Sans et al
as 4:2022cv40070
Plaintiff:
Sean Patrick Boisvert
Defendant:
Courtney Lynn Sans, James Gaven Reardon, Jr., Allysa Kilmurray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Pliler
as 1:2022cv10758
Petitioner:
Timi Y. Wallace
Respondent:
William Scott Pliler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. MCI-Shirley Medium Superintendent
as 1:2022cv10648
Plaintiff:
Luther Lee Williams
Respondent:
MCI-Shirley Medium Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Mici et al
as 1:2021cv12038
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Evans
Defendant:
Carol Mici, William A Nahim, John Does #s 1-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Lowell Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv11974
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Lowell Police Department, Lowell Regional Transportation Authority, John Leahy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foltz v. Harrington et al
as 1:2021cv11940
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Ireland Foltz
Defendant:
William K. Harrington and John P. Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
