Cases 11 - 20 of 3,513
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
Heather L. Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crusan v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Michael Crusan, Sr
Defendant:
Brian Williams, Sr., Medical Director, Aurom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza et al v. Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
Eric Mendoza and Jack Levine
Defendant:
Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
Pierce v. Southwest Airlines Co.
as 2:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
William Pierce
Defendant:
Southwest Airlines Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mahmoud v. Navarrete et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Jose Navarrete, William Hutchings, Jeniffer Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Ong
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
Berthinia S. Williams
Defendant:
Deborrah Ong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Williams v. Fisher
as 2:2024cv00640
Plaintiff:
Berthinia S. Williams
Defendant:
Keena Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Coney v. LVMPD Michael Lozo et al
as 2:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
William Coney
Defendant:
LVMPD Michael Lozo, A. Mariscal, PO J. Brandon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc. v. Estate of Matthew Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc.
Defendant:
Estate of Matthew Williams, Jam On It Basketball Academy, Inc. and Jam On It, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
