Cases 11 - 20 of 142
Shoemake v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02307
Plaintiff:
William R. Shoemake
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eckstein v. Brame et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Dale Eckstein
Defendant:
Thomas L. Brame, Sr. and Shirley Williams Brame
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Davis et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01835
Plaintiff:
Dana Davis and William Davis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01310
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Donna Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regner v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06523
Plaintiff:
Curtis William Regner
Defendant:
Davol A Subsidiary C.R. Bard, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gillpatrick v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv06279
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Gillpatrick, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of Ohio ex rel et al v. City of Mentor et al
as 1:2020cv02360
Defendant:
Mentor City Council, City of Mentor and Mentor Municipal Planning Commission
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio ex rel. Charles P. Bolton, William P. Bolton, and Bolton Properties, Ltd., Bolton Properties, Ltd., Charles P. Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Hill, et al.
as 1:2020cv01833
Defendant:
Eva Arlene Hill, Geauga County Park District, Eva Arlene Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Arlene Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2020cv00313
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Lyle Williams and Jessica Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2020oe00312
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Lyle Williams and Jessica Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
