Cases 21 - 30 of 51
BINETTE v. YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv00612
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BINETTE
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WILLIAM KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2016cv00600
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE WOOD
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WILLIAM KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD et al v. YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2016cv00601
Plaintiff:
JAMES LEE WOOD
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and WILLIAM KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JIL v. COUNTY OF YORK MAINE et al
as 2:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JIL
Defendant:
COUNTY OF YORK MAINE and WILLIAM KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
WALTER WILLIAM MOORE
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARTIN MAGNUSSEN, JOESEPH FITSPATRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. LIBERTY
as 1:2016cv00378
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY J WILLIAMS
Respondent:
RANDALL LIBERTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BATER v. USA
as 2:2016cv00342
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
WILLIAM F BATER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MAXHAM v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
CALEB WILLIAM STANLEY MAXHAM
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, SERGEANT LANDRY and SOUTHERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABEYTA v. BUREAU et al
as 1:2015cv00429
Plaintiff:
REBECCA C ABEYTA
Defendant:
THOMAS N BUREAU, II, UNKNOWN SUPERVISOR and ROBERT A WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CUTLER et al
as 1:2014cv00539
Plaintiff:
RENARDO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DAVID J CUTLER, D SHIPMAN, UNKNOWN ADMINISTRATORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
