Cases 41 - 50 of 59
United States of America et al v. Johnson
as 1:2010mc00312
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Yolanda K. Churchwell
Defendant:
William R. Johnson
United States of America et al v. Johnson
as 1:2010mc00311
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Yolanda K. Churchwell
Defendant:
William R. Johnson
JOHNSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75469
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35874
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35933
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM V. JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JOHNSON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76157
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
JOHNSON v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2009cv74274
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
William Johnson SBI, Jr. v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 09-2095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM T. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PERRY PHELPS and ATTY GEN DE
Johnson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00010
Petitioner:
William T. Johnson
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86229
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., ABB AUTOMATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
