Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Tafari v. Baker
as 13-1479
Defendant:
Maureen Bosco, from 9:11-cv-1476, George Waterson, 9:11-cv-1429, Jason Ferrick, from 12-cv-662 and others
Appellee:
Richard Roy, from 9:12-cv-269, Brian Fischer, Commissioner, Thomas Quinn, from 9:11-cv-1390 and others
Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Tafari v. Allen
as 13-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
William Allen, Correction Lieutenant, Clinton Correctional Facility, sued in his individual and official capacities, Donald Uhler, Correction Deputy Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, sued in his individual and official capacity, Steven Racette, Correction Deputy Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, sued in his individual and official capacity and others
Tafari v. Allen
as 12-5077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Injah Tafari
Defendant - Appellee:
William Allen, Correction Lieutenant, Clinton Correctional Facility, sued in his individual and official capacities, Donald Uhler, Correction Deputy Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, sued in his individual and official capacity, Steven Racette, Correction Deputy Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, sued in his individual and official capacity and others
Tafari v. Allen et al
as 9:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
InJah Tafari
Defendant:
William Allen, Donald Uhler, Steven Racette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeder v. Hogan
as 10-4388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Raszell Reeder
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Hogan, Commissioner, Office of Mental Health, Brian Fischer, Commissioner, Department of Correctional Services, Richard Roy, Inspector General and others
Allen v. Walsh
as 1:2009cv05832
Petitioner:
William Allen
Respondent:
James J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeder v. Hogan et al
as 9:2009cv00520
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Defendant:
Michael Hogan, Brian Fischer, Richard Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
