Cases 1 - 10 of 21
MASSEUR et al v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY G. MASSEUR, TAYLOR ALLEN and MELISSA GEORGE
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS, LOUIS DEJOY and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 Fair Labor Standards Act
GRENADIER v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL (WFB) ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2022cv00743
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE SUBPOENA ISSUED TO WILLIAM D. SAMMON
as 1:2021mc00129
In Re:
SUBPOENA ISSUED TO WILLIAM D. SAMMON
Petitioner:
WILLIAM D. SAMMON
Interested Party:
FOX NEWS NETWORK, LLC and DON BLANKENSHIP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
FREEMAN v. PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2019cv02569
Plaintiff:
MARCUS R. FREEMAN and MARCELLUS R. FREEMAN
Defendant:
REGGIE B. WALTON, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, CHANNING D. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARROLL v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2016cv00837
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. CARROLL
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARROLL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2016cv00783
Petitioner:
WILLIAM D. CARROLL
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
POYNTER v. RUSSO et al
as 1:2013cv01129
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. POYNTER
Defendant:
LINDA RUSSO and JACQUELINE SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANDERSON
as 1:2011mc00640
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
WILLIAM D. ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PAUL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv01671
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. PAUL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and DC ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
