Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Riley El v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02975
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley El v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2020cv02856
Defendant:
Sgt. Pronger, Lt. Rahimi, Sherwin Miles and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley El v. Rauner et al
as 1:2019cv02002
Defendant:
Jane Doe Beck - Dietitian #1, Dr. Feely, I Qattash and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley El v. Godinez et al
as 1:2015cv11180
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Joseph Yurkovich, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley El v. Pfister
as 1:2014cv07776
Petitioner:
William D. Riley El
Respondent:
Randy Pfister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riley El v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv06725
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Marcus Hardy, Gina Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley El v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv06226
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Defendant:
State of Illinois, S.A. Godinez, Marcus Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley El v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv06227
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Marcus Hardy, Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley El v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv05773
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley El v. State of Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv05771
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Defendant:
Marcus Hardy, Assistant Warden Edwards, Wexfrod Health Sources Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
