Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Solis v. BMC Builder Corp et al
as 1:2018cv02737
Defendant:
Drywall Valmez Inc., Walter D. Florentin, BMC Builder Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Agustin Solis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Solis v. BMC Builder Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv04134
Plaintiff:
Jose Agustin Solis
Defendant:
BMC Builder Corp., Drywall Valmez Inc., Walter D. Florentin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cunningham v. New York State et al
as 1:2014cv00166
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Cunningham
Defendant:
New York State, Concepcion, Robert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chopen v. Olive Vine, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02269
Plaintiff:
Pablo Valerio Chopen
Defendant:
Zaid Demis, Meham Doe, William Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hailazopoulos v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06889
Plaintiff:
Eleni Hailazopoulos
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department/NYPD (Police Officer Alvarez), New York City Parks and Recreation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaRocca v. Suffolk County Sheriff et al
as 2:2010cv04988
Defendant:
Correction Officer James Doe, Correction Officer John Doe, Correction Officer William Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher LaRocca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Doe et al
as 1:2007cv04799
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Walker
Defendant:
William Doe and Jeffrey Zagelbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
