Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rayvon Boatman v. Elio Madan, et al
as 12-14375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIO MADAN, VICTOR SELYUTIN, WILLIAM F. MATHEWS and others
Rayvon Boatman v. William Mathews, et al
as 12-12999
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYVON BOATMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM F. MATHEWS, Physician's Assistant, VICTOR SELYUTIN, Medical Doctor, JOHN DOE, Dental Assistant and others
Boatman v. Mathews et al
as 3:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
Rayvon L. Boatman
Defendant:
William F. Mathews, Victor Selyutin, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Ward v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 11-15559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO LAVOCIA WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in his official capacity, etc., RANDALL POLK, Asst. Warden, in his official capacity, etc., G. A. ESPINO, Doctor, in his individual capacity, etc. and others
Strianese v. Buss et al
as 3:2011cv01116
Plaintiff:
Louis James Strianese
Defendant:
Edward Buss, William F. Mathews, Elio Madan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Secretary, DOC et al
as 3:2011cv00913
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lavocia Ward
Defendant:
Secretary, DOC, Randall L. Polk, G. A. Espino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman v. Madan et al
as 3:2011cv00501
Plaintiff:
Rayvon Boatman
Defendant:
Elio Madan, Victor Selyutin and William F. Mathews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justin Settle v. William Mathews, et al
as 10-15375
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN W. SETTLE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM F. MATHEWS, Dr. and CARLOS ESQUIVIA, Dr.
Clopay Corporation v. Mathews et al
as 6:2010cv01653
Plaintiff:
Clopay Corporation
Defendant:
William F. Mathews and John S. Mathews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Settle v. Mathews et al
as 3:2010cv00904
Plaintiff:
Justin W. Settle
Defendant:
William F. Mathews and Carlos Esquivia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
