Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hare v. Ranjie et al
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Hare
Defendant:
Ranjie and John and Jane Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
NICKOLOFF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53712
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FREDERICK NICKOLOFF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Olin Winchester LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00178
Defendant:
Olin Corporation and Olin Winchester LLC
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Robertson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MALZONE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv33080
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FREDERICK MALZONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREDERICKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93496
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FREDERICKS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor et al v. Harbour Bay Holdings, LLC et al
as 9:2017cv80698
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Taylor , Wm. Fred Taylor, Inc. , Medical Mall Associates of Martin County, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Harbour Bay Holdings, LLC, John J. Martino, Lewis Rinder and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
In re: William Hill
as 16-14262
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM FREDERICK HILL
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hill v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2012cv00057
Petitioner:
William Frederick Hill
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hill v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv21611
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Hill
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2011cv00171
Petitioner:
William Frederick Hill
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
