Cases 91 - 100 of 283
Pete Kefalas v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-15533
Petitioner / Appellant:
PETE KEFALAS
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Clervrain et al v. Ebert et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Emmanuel Benjoassaint, Kaity Borgella and others
Defendant:
Jhone Ebert, Charles Daniels, Ann Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kevin Kennedy v. Shelly Williams, et al
as 22-15465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN KENNEDY
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELLY WILLIAMS, BARBARA CEGAVSKE, WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and others
Jefferson v. Gittere et al
as 2:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jefferson
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, William Revbart, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iden v. Ford et al
as 3:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Richard Iden
Defendant:
A.G. Aaron Ford, Nathan Holland, Dawn Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Gittere
as 2:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Arnold Anderson
Defendant:
William Gittere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodrum v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Charles Daniels, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Gittere
as 3:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
Arnold Anderson
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Barry Harris
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, NDOC and B. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Barry Harris
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, Bowdimer, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
