Cases 1 - 10 of 71
HILDERBRAND v. SUTER et al
as 1:2014cv01449
Plaintiff:
MARK ANDREW HILDERBRAND
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, SCOTT S. HARRIS and CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE et al
as 1:2014cv00709
Plaintiff:
RICHARD COLEMAN
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, KENNETH MCHUGH, C.J. DALIARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Coleman v. State of New Hampshire, et al
as 14-5075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Coleman
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New Hampshire, Kenneth Mchugh, Judge and as Individual, C.J. Daliaris, Judge and as Individual and others
COLEMAN v. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE et al
as 1:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
RICHARD COLEMAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, KENNETH MCHUGH, C.J. DALIARIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Jackson v. William Suter, et al
as 14-5028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maurice Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Gail Johnson, Scott S. Harris and others
JACKSON v. SUTER et al
as 1:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
MAURICE JACKSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON, SCOTT S. HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnathan Johnson v. Andrew Downs, et al
as 13-5356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Johnathan Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew Downs and William K. Suter, Clerk
WILLIAMS v. FOSSUM et al
as 1:2013mc01364
Plaintiff:
GARY B. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ERIK FOSSUM and WILLIAM K. SUTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Cobble v. William Suter, et al
as 13-5316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant - Appellee:
William K. Suter, Clerk, U.S. Supreme Court and Melissa Blalock, Clerk, U.S. Supreme Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
