Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America v. Acquest Transit LLC
as 21-659
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense Army Corps of Engineers, William J. Hochul, Jr., in his official capacity as United States Attorney for the Western District of New York, Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Acquest Transit LLC, Acquest Development, LLC and Mr. William L. Huntress
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Huntress v. United States
as 19-1147
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Acquest Development, LLC and William L. Huntress
Huntress et al v. United States
as 1:2018cv02974
Plaintiff:
William L. Huntress and Acquest Development, LLC
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
United States of America v. Acquest Development, LLC
as 13-1653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Acquest Development, LLC, Acquest Transit, LLC and William L. Huntress
Huntress et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2012cv01146
Plaintiff:
William L. Huntress , Acquest Development, LLC and Acquest Transit, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice , Eric H. Holder, Jr. , William J. Hochul, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Huntress, et al v. Mugdan, et al
as 1:2012cv00559
Plaintiff:
William L. Huntress , Acquest Development, LLC , Acquest Transit, LLC and others
Defendant:
Walter E. Mugdan, Phyllis Feinmark, David Pohle and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
NOSAW (Neighbors Organized To Save Amherst's Wetlands) et al v. Acquest Wehrle, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00297
Plaintiff:
NOSAW (Neighbors Organized To Save Amherst's Wetlands), Thomas Suchyna, Ann Suchyna and others
Defendant:
Acquest Wehrle, LLC, William L. Huntress, Acquest Development, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
