Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Earnest Woods, II v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 18-15410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRELL ADAMS, Warden at Corcoran State Prison, MAURICE JUNIOUS, Chief Deputy Warden at CCI, NICHOLS and others
Earnest Woods, II v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 14-16335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRELL ADAMS, MAURICE JUNIOUS, NICHOLS and others
Woods v. Adams et al
as 1:2013cv00621
Plaintiff:
Earnest Cassell Woods, II
Defendant:
Darrell Adams, Maurice Junious, Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvin Ross v. William McGuinness, et al
as 11-16017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVIN RONNEL ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM MCGUINNESS, Chief Medical Officer & Medical Doctor, JULIAN KIM, Doctor and SMITH, Orthopedic doctor
Robert Smith, III v. CDCR, et al
as 11-15439
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT P. SMITH, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GERSTEL, Dr. and others
Carlos Villegas v. Cate et al
as 1:2010cv01917
Plaintiff:
Carlos Villegas
Defendant:
Mathew Cate, Denny Sallade, A.K. Scribner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barrett v. Cate et al
as 1:2009cv01741
Plaintiff:
Robert E Barrett
Defendant:
M. Cate, I. Grillo, Robert Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deadmon v. Grannis
as 1:2007cv00927
Plaintiff:
Relaun V. Deadmon
Defendant:
N. Grannis, M Hodges-Wilkins, J. William McGuinness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koch v. Neubarth et al
as 1:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
Rodney S. Koch
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neubarth, Thanit Hasadsri, William McGuinness and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
