Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Aung v. Barr, et al
as 1:2020cv00681
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad Wolf, Thomas Feeley and others
Petitioner:
YAE HTAT AUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rangolan v. Barr et al
as 6:2020cv06355
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad Wolf, Thomas E. Feeley and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Neville Rangolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FABIAN v. BARR
as 9:2020cv00456
Petitioner:
SEAN FABIAN
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rangolan v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00628
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad Wolf, Thomas E. Feeley and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Neville Rangolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gabriel v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00371
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Thomas Feeley and William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Ramos Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Espinoza v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00595
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Thomas Feeley and William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Remy Antonio Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ahmed v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00395
Respondent:
Chad F Wolf, Lee Bowes, Michael T. Phillips and others
Petitioner:
Munir Ahmed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Watson v. Searls et al
as 1:2020cv00517
Defendant:
Jeffrey Searls, Thomas E. Feeley, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MORRIS v. BARR
as 9:2020cv00454
Petitioner:
MIGUEL JUNIOR MORRIS
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reynoso v. Aviles
as 15-2700
Petitioner:
Eusebio Reynoso
Respondent:
Oscar Aviles, in his official capacity as Warden of Hudson County Jail, Christopher Shanahan, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
