Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jerdine v. Withers et al
as 3:2020cv00808
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lewis Jerdine
Defendant:
William P. Barr and Warden Shannon D. Withers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massaly v. Gillis et al
as 5:2020cv00155
Defendant:
Diane L. Witte, Attorney General William P. Barr, Warden Shawn R. Gillis and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Victor Jerry Massaly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reeves v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00129
Defendant:
Secretary Unknown, Attorney General William P. Barr, Stanley Crocket and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Clovis Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Okorafor v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00120
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Heanyi Joseph Okorafor
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Shawn R. Gillis, John-Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vurimindi v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00106
Plaintiff:
Vamsidhar Vurimindi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Kevin K. McAleen, Unknown John-Doe, William P. Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Figuereo v. Gillis et al
as 5:2019cv00084
Defendant:
Warden Shawn R. Gillis and Attorney General William P. Barr
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Figuereo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ali v. Barr et al
as 5:2019cv00071
Respondent:
Oakdale Field Operations Director, ICE Office of Detention and Removal Office, William P. Barr and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Ahmed Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wal v. Barr
as 5:2019cv00070
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Respondent:
William P. Barr and Shawn R. Gillis
Petitioner:
Buay T. Wal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pasha v. Barr et al
as 5:2019cv00067
Interested Party:
Pto Se
Defendant:
Attorney General William P. Barr, Secretary of DHS, ICE Office of Detention and Removal Office and others
Plaintiff:
Abu Bakar Muhamed Pasha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
