Cases 41 - 50 of 99
Hill v. Scism
as 3:2011cv00080
Petitioner:
Anthony Hill
Respondent:
William Scism
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. William Scism
as 11-1059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR L. HAIRSTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM SCISM
Valles v. Scism et al
as 1:2010cv02620
Petitioner:
Michael Valles
Respondent:
Williams Scism , R. Johnson , Todd W. Cerney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Calvin Nelson v. Tyrone Williams, et al
as 10-5429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Calvin B. Nelson
Defendant - Appellee:
Tyrone Williams, Community Supervision Officer, Individual Capacity, Edward F. Rielly, Ex-Chairman of Parole Commission, Isacc Fulwood, Chairman of the United States Parole Commission, Individual Capacity and others
Bullard v. Scism et al
as 1:2010cv02528
Petitioner:
Derrick Bullard
Respondent:
Warden William Scism and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BELT v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 4:2010cv02333
Petitioner:
Tariq L. Belt
Respondent:
Office of Attorney General, Eric Holder, U.s. district court district of maryland branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diaz v. Scism et al
as 1:2010cv02457
Petitioner:
Jorge Albert Diaz
Respondent:
William Scism and The Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BELT v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2010cv01958
Petitioner:
TARIQ L. BELT
Respondent:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, ERIC HOLDER, U.S. DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BRANCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miguel Cabrera v. William Scism
as 10-4340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL CABRERA
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM SCISM, Warden of Allenwood, LSCI
Belt v. US Federal Govt. Dept. of Justice et al
as 4:2010cv02339
Petitioner:
Tariq Belt
Respondent:
US Federal Govt. Dept. of Justice, LSCI Allenwood, LSCI Allenwood Office of Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
