Cases 71 - 80 of 4,753
Minnfee v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2016cv00079
Petitioner:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Manjano v. Stephens
as 6:2016cv00106
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Ivan Jose Manjano
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chiles v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00533
Petitioner:
Danny Napolean Chiles
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nunez v. Stephens
as 5:2016cv00421
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Clemente Nunez, Jr.
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2016cv01173
Petitioner:
Timmy A Dawson
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Johnson v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-10518
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN LEE JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Javier Yebra v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-10519
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAVIER YEBRA
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Mathews v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00529
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Rickie A. Mathews
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv01170
Plaintiff:
Kenthony Jevelle Jackson
Respondent:
Williams Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Stephens
as 3:2016cv00113
Petitioner:
Joshua Lane
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
