Cases 81 - 90 of 4,753
Ricky Justice v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20271
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKY BARNARD JUSTICE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Flores v. William Stephens
as 1:2016cv00526
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and William Stephens
Plaintiff:
Juan Felipe Flores
Defendant:
Oscar J Hale, Jr, Paul Thomson and Webb County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morales v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv01180
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Jesus Morales
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mario Perez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-50430
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO PEREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Davis v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv01166
Petitioner:
Willie Davis
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas Florence v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-40615
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS W. FLORENCE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Chavez v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv01155
Petitioner:
Henry Chavez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steve Battles v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-40607
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVE BATTLES
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Richardson v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv01143
Petitioner:
Damon Jerome Richardson
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keith Hill v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-20268
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH CHESTER HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
