Cases 81 - 90 of 5,430
Rogers v. Slyder et al
as 9:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jarraid Rogers
Defendant:
Sgt. Slyder and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Slyger et al
as 9:2016cv00176
Plaintiff:
Jesus Hernandez
Defendant:
Sgt. Slyger and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Slyder et al
as 9:2016cv00175
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt L Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Slyder and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Stephens et al
as 9:2016cv00167
Plaintiff:
Ricky Barnard Justice
Defendant:
William Stephens, Warden Harris, Co. McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Davis
as 3:2016cv00428
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney and Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Chris Sanchez
Respondent:
Williams Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv01081
Petitioner:
Jamal Kiano Anthony Boyd
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and William Stephens
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Stephen
as 6:2016cv00369
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephen
Petitioner:
Willie Smith Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delk v. Stephen
as 1:2016cv01066
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Darnell Lee Delk
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noriega v. Stephens
as 5:2016cv00918
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and William Stephens
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Arturo Noriega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCray v. Livingston et al
as 6:2016cv01157
Plaintiff:
Robert Harley McCray
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Bryan Collier, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
