Cases 81 - 90 of 3,795
Tatum et al v. Slyger et al
as 9:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Julius Tatum, II, Marlon D Thomas, Waymond Jackson and others
Respondent:
Slyger and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv01743
Petitioner:
Rosali Bonilla
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brock v. Stephens
as 6:2016cv00174
Petitioner:
Dana Lanette Brock
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vanover v. Stephens et al
as 4:2016cv01694
Plaintiff:
William Vanover
Defendant:
William Stephens, Castleberry and Oberandzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tatum et al v. Slyger et al
as 4:2016cv01697
Plaintiff:
Julius Tatum, II, Marlon D Thomas, Waymond Jackson and others
Defendant:
Slyger and William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Herring et al
as 3:2016cv01564
Plaintiff:
Timothy Randolph Wallace
Defendant:
John H Herring, William Gonzalez, Jane or John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cisneros v. Davis
as 1:2016cv00672
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Morales Cisneros
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cisneros v. Davis
as 1:2016cv00674
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Morales Cisneros
Respondent:
Lorie Davis and William Stephens
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cisneros v. Davis
as 1:2016cv00673
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Morales Cisneros
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and William Stephens
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cisneros v. Davis
as 1:2016cv00671
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Morales Cisneros
Defendant:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
