Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Meyer et al v. U.S. Pipeline, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv01593
Plaintiff:
Matthew Meyer and Sharon Meyer
Defendant:
U.S. Pipeline, Inc., Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and The Williams Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
MAINS et al v. THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
as 5:2020cv00112
Defendant:
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ANDREA MAINS and SCOTT MAINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02154
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
FAIRCHILD v. THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01465
Defendant:
WILLIAMS ENERGY RESOURCES, LLC. and THE WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FAIRCHILD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2019cv00665
Defendant:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cope et al v. A.I.I Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00728
Defendant:
Kolmar Laboratories, Inc., Unimin Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Loretta Belac and Faith Belac Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Eleazer v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
as 1:2019cv00600
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Plaintiff:
Jahan Eleazer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
