Cases 1 - 10 of 14
DALCOLLO v. FLORES et al
as 1:2023cv03713
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L. DALCOLLO
Defendant:
RAMERO FLORES, MARY FLORES and ANTHONY WILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WILLS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ROBERT BROWN, JAMES LOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
IN RE: SUBPOENA MATTER
as 1:2015mc01444
Plaintiff:
KELLY MILLER
Defendant:
GERALD WILLS and RICH PARRIS
IN RE: SUBPOENA MATTER
as 1:2015mc01384
Plaintiff:
KELLY MILLER
Defendant:
GERALD WILLS and RICH PARRIS
WILLE v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2015cv00660
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SYLVIA M. BURWELL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITLEY v. FANNIE MAE et al
as 1:2012cv00453
Plaintiff:
CHARLESTON EARL WHITLEY
Defendant:
FANNIE MAE, WILLS ESTATE INHERITANCE, CONTINENTIAL HOTEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLS v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2011cv01464
Plaintiff:
JOE L. WILLS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
BROWN et al v. ON THE GO TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00371
Plaintiff:
HARVEY BROWN , CHARLES BURWELL , JEROME HICKS and others
Defendant:
ON THE GO TRANSPORTATION, INC., KENNETH WILLS and MELISSA WILLS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
