Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Thompson v C&H Sugar Company, Inc.
as 2:2013cv01869
Plaintiff:
Willie Mae Thompson
Defendant:
C&H Sugar Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v C&H Sugar Company, Inc.
as 2:2013at01040
Plaintiff:
Willie Mae Thompson
Defendant:
C&H Sugar Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Ilunga Adell v. Rosalyn Willis Ilunga
as 2:2013cv04103
Cross Defendant:
Ilunga Adell, Does, Rosalyn Willis Ilunga and others
Petitioner:
Ilunga Adell
Respondent:
Rosalyn Willis Ilunga
Cross Claimant:
Producer-Writers Guild of America Pension Plan
Velasquez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2012cv05012
Plaintiff:
Willie Velasquez
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Joe Kapp et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2012cv05833
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp., Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Anderson, Sr., Joseph Beauchamp, David Cadigan and others
Sheila Willis v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2012cv04001
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Plaintiff:
Sheila Willis
Van Simmons v. iServe Residential Lending LLC et al
as 8:2012cv00229
Defendant:
Does, National Asset Direct, Gary Willis and others
Plaintiff:
Van Simmons
Willie Davis v. County of Los Angeles
as 2:2011cv08831
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles
Plaintiff:
Willie Davis
Dave Pear et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2011cv08395
Plaintiff:
Bobby E Abrams, Jr, Stephanie Abrams, Patrice Adams and others
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp, Easton-Bell Sports Inc and others
Ford v. Willis North America LTD Plan et al
as 2:2011cv02616
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ford
Defendant:
Willis North America LTD Plan and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
