Cases 41 - 50 of 631
Murry v. Hill et al
as 4:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
James Willie Murry
Defendant:
Victor Hill, Clayton County Jail Administration, Officer Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILLARD v. USA
as 1:2022cv00157
Petitioner:
WILLIE DILLARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Holmes v. Baxter et al
as 4:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Baxter, Clp. Willis, Ofc. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge v. Wilkes
as 1:2022cv03909
Petitioner:
Willie C. Hodge
Respondent:
Warden Wilkes and The Attorney General of the State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Footman v. Willis
as 1:2022cv03859
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Footman
Defendant:
Fani T. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath et al v. Adams et al
as 6:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antonio Heath, Crishaun Heath, Christen Heath and others
Defendant:
Warden Brian Adams, Joseph Barnes, Quan Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. DA Office of Atlanta
as 1:2022cv03665
Plaintiff:
Willie Turner
Defendant:
DA Office of Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROSBY v. LOCKETTE et al
as 1:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
JAMES L CROSBY
Defendant:
JUDGE WILLIE LOCKETTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY GREG EDWARDS, CLERK OF COURTS EVONNE MULL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bennett et al
as 5:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Alphonse Johnson
Defendant:
Ramsey Bennett, Kelvin Britt, Robert Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Willis et al
as 4:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes
Defendant:
Cpl Willis, Sgt. Baxter, Cpl. Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
