Cases 1 - 10 of 195
Gonzales v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02048
Plaintiff:
Willie Gonzales
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
James Warren Willis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bushner v. Kerner et al
as 2:2024cv01861
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Bushner
Defendant:
Investigator Eric Kerner, Investigator John/Jane Tabor, Captain John/Jane Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Tracy Reveal, Chae Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Davol Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Daniel Willis
Defendant:
Davol Inc., and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Robin Willis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard davol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willis v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03911
Plaintiff:
Rodney Willis
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Poole v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03905
Plaintiff:
Willie Edward Poole, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Cooper v. Willis et al
as 2:2023cv03753
Plaintiff:
Kitt Channing Cooper, Jr.
Defendant:
Wayne Willis, Jeannie E Willis and Jason Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
