Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Winden v. Black et al
as 1:2023cv02684
Plaintiff:
Anita Winden
Defendant:
Brandon Black and Park West Imaging
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Burnham v. Winden, et al
as 23-1292
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR BURNHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
WINDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
In re: Burnham v. , et al
as 23-1264
Petitioner:
ARTHUR BURNHAM
Respondent:
WINDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
In re: Burnham v. , et al
as 23-1237
Petitioner:
ARTHUR BURNHAM
Respondent:
WINDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Harter v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv01249
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Harter
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Matthew Winden and Clinton Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gantt v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gantt
Defendant:
James Johnson, Larry Winegardner, Thomas Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnham v. Winden et al
as 1:2023cv01025
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
Winden and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. Winden
as 1:2023cv00938
Petitioner:
Albert R. Garza
Respondent:
Matthew Winden and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnham v. Winden, et al
as 23-1097
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR BURNHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN WINDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Rocha v. Executive Director Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jose Guadalupe Roche and Jose Guadalupe Rocha
Defendant:
Executive Director Colorado Department of Corrections, Matt Winden and Stephanie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
