Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wingfield v. Adekoya
as 9:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Adesunkanmi Adekoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingfield v. Garner et al
as 6:2021cv00320
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Unknown Garner, Unknown Hinejosa and Unknown Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingfield v. Garner et al
as 9:2021cv00136
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Unknown Garner, Unknown Hinejosa and Unknown Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Geneticare Health Solutions et al
as 4:2019cv00867
Defendant:
Brandon Muzik, Preston Wingfield, Geneticare Health Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Wingfield v. Collier et al
as 9:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Unknown Adekoya, Lt Unknown Cannon, Brian Collier and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingfield v. Director TDCJ - CID
as 7:2018cv00144
Respondent:
Director TDCJ - CID
Petitioner:
Anthony Bernard Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00391
Plaintiff:
Bradley Wingfield Miller
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. , The Home Depot, Inc. and HD Development Properties, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wingfield v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00723
Plaintiff:
Paul J Wingfield
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingfield et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
as 4:2015cv00453
Plaintiff:
Wanda J. Wingfield and Willie H. Wingfield
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wingfield v. Director of TDCJ et al
as 1:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Wingfield
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ, FNU Carlisle and Unknown Female Occupant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
