Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Winters v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
Daniel Winters
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sorenson v. Office of the Minnesota Attorney General et al
as 0:2014cv02929
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Lori Swanson, Aaron Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winters v. United States of America
as 0:2014cv01154
Petitioner:
Louis Boy Winters
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Winters v. US Dept. of Justice & FBOP-Branch FCI Sandstone et al
as 0:2013cv00214
Plaintiff:
Louis Boy Winters
Defendant:
US Dept. of Justice & FBOP-Branch FCI Sandstone and Scott Fisher
Lawson Products, Inc. v. Anderson et al
as 0:2012cv02882
Plaintiff:
Lawson Products, Inc.
Defendant:
James Scott Anderson, James R. Roy and Bruce Winter
Winter v. Bank of America National Association
as 0:2012cv01438
Plaintiff:
Douglas Winter
Defendant:
Bank of America National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ransom et al v. VFS, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv01197
Plaintiff:
Billy Ransom , Michael Joseph Hayes , Mark Haaf and others
Defendant:
VFS, Inc. , Warren Amundson and Donna M. Walraven
Counter_claimant:
Warren Amundson , Donna M. Walraven and VFS, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Daniel Brian Benson , Daniel Bess , Leroy Bledsoe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Preston v. AMER Sports et al
as 0:2011cv03422
Plaintiff:
Donna E. Preston
Defendant:
AMER Sports, AMER Sports Winter & Outdoor Company, Salomon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winters v. Fisher
as 0:2011cv02625
Plaintiff:
Louis Boy Winters
Defendant:
Scott Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv04654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
