Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wirtgen GmbH v. ITC
as 21-1127
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Appellant:
WIRTGEN GMBH, JOSEPH VOGELE AG, WIRTGEN GROUP HOLDING GMBH and others
Caterpillar Paving Products Inc. v. Wirtgen America, Inc.
as 20-1998
Appellee:
JOSEPH VOGELE AG, WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC. and WIRTGEN GMBH
Appellant:
CATERPILLAR PAVING PRODUCTS INC.
Intervenor:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Wirtgen GmbH v. ITC
as 20-1623
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Appellant:
WIRTGEN GMBH, JOSEPH VOGELE AG, WIRTGEN GROUP HOLDING GMBH and others
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc.
as 20-1527
Appellant:
WIRTGEN GMBH and WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.
Appellee:
CATERPILLAR PAVING PRODUCTS INC.
Wirtgen GmbH v. ITC
as 19-2320
Appellant:
WIRTGEN GROUP HOLDING GMBH, WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC., WIRTGEN GMBH and others
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Intervenor:
CATERPILLAR INC. and CATERPILLAR PAVING PRODUCTS, INC.
Caterpillar Inc. v. ITC
as 19-2306
Appellant:
CATERPILLAR PAVING PRODUCTS, INC., CATERPILLAR INC., WIRTGEN GROUP HOLDING GMBH and others
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Caterpillar Inc. v. ITC
as 19-2020
Appellant:
CATERPILLAR PAVING PRODUCTS, INC. and CATERPILLAR INC.
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Intervenor:
WIRTGEN GROUP HOLDING GMBH, WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC., WIRTGEN GMBH and others
Hanover Insurance Company v. Wirtgen, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00176
Defendant:
Wirtgen GmbH, Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc., Caterpillar Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Costa et al v. Wirtgen International GMBH & CO. KG et al
as 2:2013cv00749
Plaintiff:
Rui Costa and Kimberly Costa
Defendant:
Wirtgen International GMBH & CO. KG, Wirtgen America, Inc. and Wirtgen GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
