Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SHEPHARD v. MASIC et al
as 1:2017cv01843
Plaintiff:
ALONZO DEAN SHEPHARD
Defendant:
JOHN MASIC, WISEMAN, DUNCON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDMUNDS v. BUSH et al
as 1:2016cv00979
Plaintiff:
HEATHER ANN EDMUNDS
Defendant:
GEORGE W BUSH, SR, KEITH ZOLLINGER, MARTHA THORPE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RENEAU et al v. UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2016cv00966
Plaintiff:
SUSAN RENEAU , ROBERT FIELDS , MARVIN KASCHKE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and DANIEL M. ASHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
WISEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2010cv01340
Petitioner:
KEVIN TRACY WISEMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv01486
Plaintiff:
LATISH BROWN, GEROLEAN CURETON, JOANN DAVIS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ALLEN et al v. SCHAFER, et al
as 1:2009cv01422
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN, GWENDOLYN ANDERSON, HENRY ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
TYLER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv00864
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE TYLER, LATREATHA HENDRIX, KENNETH COLE and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and MICHELLE RHEE
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
REED et al v. KEMPTHORNE et al
as 1:2008cv02117
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL P. REED, DAVID S. WISEMAN, JON MALCOLM and others
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE and DALE HALL
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TRUSCOTT et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 1:2007cv02283
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY TRUSCOTT, STEVEN UTSCHIG, ROBERT WILHIDE and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
