Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Alford v. Schweitzer et al
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Warden Tom Schweitzer, Mr. C. Cann, Mr. Z. Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. Schweitzer et al
as 1:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Tom Schweitzer, Mr. C. Cann, Mr. Z. Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kolle v. Kyle et al
as 2:2021cv00984
Defendant:
Deborah Priece, J. Dillon, Larry McGarvey and others
Plaintiff:
John LaMar Kolle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willoughby v. Harger et al
as 2:2020cv00620
Defendant:
Jayme H. Fountain, James W. Dean, Robert Radcliff and others
Plaintiff:
Raheem Willoughby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolford v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2017cv00901
Plaintiff:
Michael Wolford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wolford v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2016cv00998
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Wolford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Wolford v. Menorah Park Center for Senior Living Bet Moshav Zekenim Hadati et al
as 1:2016cv00909
Defendant:
Menorah Park Center for Senior Living Bet Moshav Zekenim Hadati , Denise Trun , David Granito and others
Plaintiff:
Latoya Wolford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Wolford v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2015cv02710
Plaintiff:
James E. Wolford
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Jones v. Ford et al
as 3:2015cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ivan M Jones
Defendant:
Danette Ford, Chris Neise, Ben Downard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolford v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01572
Plaintiff:
Patrick L. Wolford
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
