Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Valdez et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv07496
Amicus Curiae:
National Employment Law Project, Bet Tzedek, Womens Employment Rights Clinic of Golden Gate University School of Law and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber USA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Worksafe, Benjamin Valdez, Hector Castellanos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Susana Castillo, et al v. Gretchen Whitmer, et al
as 20-1815
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSANA CASTILLO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MANUEL NUNEZ MORALES, JR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, TRUE BLUE BERRY MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY MCDOWELL, in his official capacity as the Director of the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, ROBERT GORDON, in his official capacity as the Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and GRETCHEN WHITMER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan
Amicus Curiae:
PUBLIC COUNSEL, NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER, MAURICE & JANE SUGAR LAW CENTER FOR ECONOMIC & SOCIAL JUSTICE and others
County of Santa Clara v. Donald J. Trump et al
as 3:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Dana J. Boente, Mark Sandy and others
Amicus Curiae:
LifeMoves, City of Salinas, Administrative Law Professors and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Young Women's Christian Association of Silicon Valley
Intervenor Defendant:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
NES Worksafe v. Walter Toebe Construction Company et al
as 2:2008cv11054
Defendant:
Walter Toebe Construction Company and Federal Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
NES Worksafe and NES Worksafe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
