Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Williams v. City of Emeryville et al
as 3:2024cv02105
Plaintiff:
Taurice Williams
Defendant:
City of Emeryville, Dino Cristiani, Baylee Worthen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Worthen v. Municipal Corporation of Sausalito et al
as 3:2022cv03627
Plaintiff:
Daniel Charles Worthen
Defendant:
Municipal Corporation of Sausalito, Chris Zapata, Stacie Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Worthen et al v. Crane Co.
as 4:2019cv01028
Plaintiff:
Patricia Worthen, David Worthen and Denise Carrell
Defendant:
Crane Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worthen, as Wrongful Death Heir, and as Successor-In-Interest to George Lee Worthen, Deceased et al v. Crane Co.
as 3:2019cv00998
Plaintiff:
Particia Worthen, as Wrongful Death Heir, and as Successor-In-Interest to George Lee Worthen, Deceased, Denise Carrell, as Legal Heir of George Lee Worthen, Deceased and David Worthen, as Legal Heir of George Lee Worthen, Deceased
Defendant:
Crane Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worthen et al v. Crane Co.
as 3:2019cv00999
Plaintiff:
Patricia Worthen, David Worthen and Denise Carrell
Defendant:
Crane Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worthen v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 3:2018cv01349
Plaintiff:
David Worthen
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rachel Lessem et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02841
Plaintiff:
Jane E. Abbey, Hiawatha Barksdale, Margaret Beech and others
Defendant:
DOES, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03181
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Darrell Worthen v. Deborah Lee James
as 2:2015cv01747
Defendant:
Deborah Lee James
Plaintiff:
Darrell Worthen
Worthen Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012at00103
Plaintiff:
Wyndel Lynn Worthen Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
