Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Esparza v. Captain M. Macedo et al
as 4:2023cv04103
Plaintiff:
Eric Esparza
Defendant:
Captain M. Macedo, Sgt. M. Marquez, Sgt. Stupea and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Vergara
as 23-60170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant / Appellee:
Raphael Vergara, Warden, Unknown Wilkinson, Warden, Unknown Kessler, Warden and others
Matury v. Wynne Unit et al
as 4:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Marcus Matury
Defendant:
Wynne Unit, Srg. Akeada and Warden R. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matury v. Wynne Unit et al; DO NOT DOCKET: Case transferred to Houston Division; 4:23cv00771.
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Marcus Matury
Defendant:
Wynne Unit, Srg. Akeada and Warden R. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Bowers et al
as 4:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Palmer
Defendant:
Rodger Bowers, Justin C. Sands, Johnny W. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Wynne Unit Medical Staff
as 4:2022cv03898
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Palmer
Defendant:
Wynne Unit Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silvas v. Medical Dept et al
as 4:2022cv03568
Plaintiff:
Julian Silvas
Defendant:
Medical Dept, Doctor Tran-Wynne Unit, Warden Bowers - Wynne Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blaney v. Wynne Unit Warden
as 4:2022cv02334
Plaintiff:
Jerry Blaney
Defendant:
Wynne Unit Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blaney v. Wynne Unit Warden
as 3:2022cv01374
Plaintiff:
Jerry Blaney
Defendant:
Wynne Unit Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Vergara
as 22-60268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant / Appellee:
Raphael Vergara, Warden, Unknown Wilkinson, Warden, Unknown Kessler, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
