Cases 1 - 10 of 26
NEURELIS INC. v. CALIFF et al
as 1:2024cv01576
Plaintiff:
NEURELIS INC.
Defendant:
ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as) Commissioner of Food and Drugs, U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Tennessee v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 24-5220
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. FDA, et al
as 24-1049
Petitioner:
Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Respondent:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Namandje Bumpus, Ph.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner of Food and Drugs and others
Norwich Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 23-5311
Plaintiff:
Norwich Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs and United States Food and Drug Administration
Intervenor:
Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Medica Insurance Company v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-5276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Medica Insurance Company
Defendant / Appellant:
Xavier Becerra, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
Haller v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
as 22-3054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dr. Daniel Haller and Long Island Surgical PLLC
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, United States Office of Personnel Management, United States Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201 and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Physicians Advocacy Institute and others
Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. FDA, et al
as 23-5200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cigar Association of America, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-5220
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Cigar Association of America, Cigar Rights of America and Premium Cigar Association
Not Yet Classified:
Alec Bradley Cigar Distributors, Inc., Ashton Distributors, Inc., Holt Cigar Company, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Catherine Johnson, et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 23-5128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Catherine Johnson, Cara Bunnell, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and, National Multiple Sclerosis Society and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Katherine Vaczi
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 23-5142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Food and Drug Administration
Intervenor / Appellee:
Invagen Pharmaceuticals, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
