Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sun v. Cuomo
as 19-3763
Respondent:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of New York State
Petitioner:
Xiu Jian Sun, the spiritual Adam, The Chruch of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Servant
Church of Jesus Christ of Latt v. Chatigny
as 19-3563
Petitioner:
Xiu Jian Sun, The Spiritual Adam and Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Respondent:
Robert N. Chatigny, Pharisees
The Church of Jesus Christ of v. Newman
as 18-1640
Petitioner:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, S Xiu Jian Sun, the Spiritual Adam
Respondent:
Jon O. Newman, The Pharisees even Swallowed Up Camels, Jose A. Cabranes, The Pharisees Even Swallowed Up Camels, Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, The Pharisees Even Swallowed Up Camels and others
Sun v. Mullkoff
as 18-1535
Petitioner:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Xiu Jian Sun, the Spiritual Adam
Respondent:
Stephen Mullkoff, Esq. Demidchk Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
Sun v. New York State Attorney Genera
as 17-3697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun, Servant of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; The Spiritual Adam
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State Attorney General, Charles F. Sanders, (Wang Xing Ren), Michael Siudzinski, (Wang Xing Ren) & Office of the Attorney General of NY and others
Sun v. Supreme Court of the State of
as 17-3246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Servant
Defendant - Appellee:
Supreme Court of Queens County, Preliminary Conference Part
Sun v. Chow
as 17-3249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun
Defendant - Appellee:
H. Chow, City of New York Human Resources Administration Family Independence Administration and Denise David, City of New York Human Resources Administration Family Independence Administration
Sun v. Asiello
as 17-2314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun, Servant: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day saints, AKA the spiritual Adam
Defendant - Appellee:
John P. Asiello, Jonathan Lippman, Janet DiFiore and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
