Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Corr-Williams v. FDA
as 24-60068
Petitioner: Corr-Williams Company and Fontem US, L.L.C.
Respondent: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Mesa Hills Specialty Hospital v. Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00459
Plaintiff: Mesa Hills Specialty Hospital
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TX Medical Assoc v. HHS
as 23-40605
Plaintiff / Appellee: Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, L.L.C., Dr. Adam Corley and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Personnel Management, United States Department of Labor and others
R.J. Reynolds Vapor v. FDA
as 23-60545
Petitioner: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Mississippi Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Stores Association and others
Respondent: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae: 24 Vaping Product Industry Advocacy Associations
Reliance Behavioral Health, P.C. v. Becerra
as 5:2023cv01151
Plaintiff: Reliance Behavioral Health, P.C.
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
State of Texas v. Becerra
as 23-10564
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Texas and Lubbock Independent School District
Defendant / Appellant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Jooyuen Chang, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary and others
Texas Medical Association v. HHS
as 23-40217
Plaintiff / Appellee: Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, L.L.C., Doctor Adam Corley and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury and others
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor: Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court: 240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Braidwood Mgmt Inc. v. Becerra
as 23-10326
Plaintiff / Appellee: Braidwood Management, Incorporated, John Scott Kelley, Kelley Orthodontics and others
Defendant / Appellant: Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, United States of America, Janet Yellen, Secretary, U.S. Department of Treasury, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae: American Lung Association, Service Employees International Union, Adult Vaccine Access Coalition and others
R.J. Reynolds v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-60128
Petitioner: R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, L.L.C., Avail Vapor Texas, L.L.C. and others
Respondent: United States Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?