Cases 1 - 10 of 14
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-1298
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, LLC, Avail Vapor Texas, LLC and others
Respondent:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health & Human Services and others
Safe Haven Home Care, Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human Servi
as 23-1231
Plaintiff:
Evergreen Homecare Service of NY Inc. and DHCare Homehealth, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Safe Haven Home Care, Inc., Elim Home Care Agency, LLC, Silver Lining Homecare Agency and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, (HHS), Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Defendant:
Brett I. Friedman, in his official capacity as Medicaid Director of the New York State Department of Health
Timothy Baxter v. FDA, et al
as 23-1109
Petitioner:
Timothy Baxter
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services and United States of America
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-1099
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, LLC, Avail Vapor Texas, LLC and others
Respondent:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
John Breda v. USA, et al
as 23-5079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John A. Breda, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Practitioner Data Bank, An entity of and run by the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services and others
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-1049
Petitioner:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, RJR Vapor Company, LLC, Avail Vapor Texas, LLC and others
Respondent:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Robert McKinnon Califf, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food & Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
American College of Pediatricians, et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 23-5053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PEDIATRICIANS, on behalf of its members and CATHOLIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, on behalf of its members
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Vein & Wellness Group, LLC v. Xavier Becerra
as 22-2253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VEIN & WELLNESS GROUP, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Optimal Wireless LLC v. IRS, et al
as 22-5121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Optimal Wireless LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Charles Rettig, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue and others
Safe Haven Home Care, Inc. v. United States Department of He
as 22-695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Safe Haven Home Care, Inc., Evergreen Homecare Service of NY Inc., Elim Home Care Agency, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
