Cases 1 - 7 of 7
American Electric Power Service Corporation, et al v. FERC
as 23-2734
Petitioner:
American Electric Power Service Corporation, Xcel Energy, Inc. and Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Trade Commission v. Peabody Energy Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Arch Coal, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and OGE Energy Corp.
Intervenor:
Public Service Company of Oklahoma, Indiana Michigan Power Company, Southwestern Electric Power Company and others
Interested Party:
Morrison & Foerster LLP, Alliant Energy, Caterpillar Inc. and others
Petitioner:
NRG Energy, Inc., The Southern Company, DTE Energy Company and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Texas Municipal Power Agency and Western Coal Traffic League
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Bardwell v. Xcel Energy Inc.
as 0:2015cv00607
Plaintiff:
Andrew H. Bardwell
Defendant:
Xcel Energy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 153
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Xcel Energy, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv02275
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Xcel Energy, Inc., Northern States Power Minnesota and Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Heartland Regional Medical Center et al v. Oneok, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv06048
Plaintiff:
Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center, Heartland Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant:
Oneok, Inc., Oneok Energy Marketing and Trading Company, L.P., Kansas Gas Marketing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
