Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Banks et al v. Nett et al
as 5:2014cv00983
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks, Spence Taylor and John Michael
Defendant:
Elizabeth Nett, Ralph Shrader, Booz Allen Hamilton Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xerox Corporation v Five Star Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00323
Plaintiff:
Xerox Corporation
Defendant:
Five Star Technologies, Inc., Tracy D Johnson, Mary A Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Xerox Corporation v. Aerios Direct, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02077
Plaintiff:
Xerox Corporation
Defendant:
Aerios Direct, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Xerox Corporation v. Type Etc. Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00657
Plaintiff:
Xerox Corporation
Defendant:
Type Etc. Inc. and Michael A Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Xerox Corporation v. On Target Marketing, L.L.C.
as 1:2012cv00193
Plaintiff:
Xerox Corporation
Defendant:
On Target Marketing, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Xerox Corporation v. Mathis
as 6:2008cv00356
Plaintiff:
Xerox Corporation and Xerox Corporation
Defendant:
Rodney Mathis
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Chandler v. Swain et al
as 2:2008cv02371
Plaintiff:
Cherie K. Chandler
Defendant:
Christopher L. Swain and Xerox Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Xerox Corporation v. Otoe Missouria Tribe of Indians
as 5:2008cv00099
Plaintiff:
Xerox Corporation and Xerox Corporation
Defendant:
Otoe Missouria Tribe of Indians
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Xerox Corporation v. Executive Marketing Services, et al.
as 1:2007rj00004
Plaintiff:
Xerox Corporation
Defendant:
Executive Marketing Services, et al. and Anthony Knight
Garnishee:
Land Title Agency of Arizona, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
