Cases 11 - 20 of 163
In re: Ronald Schwartz, et al v. Yahoo! Inc., et al
as 20-16779
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAADYA KAUFMANN, REUVEN NATHANSON, JENNIFER J. MYERS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AABACO SMALL BUSINESS, LLC and YAHOO! INC.
Appellant:
JAMES MCCAIN
Not Classified By Court:
In re: YAHOO! INC. CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
In re: Ronald Schwartz, et al v. Yahoo! Inc., et al
as 20-16633
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAADYA KAUFMANN, REUVEN NATHANSON, JENNIFER J. MYERS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AABACO SMALL BUSINESS, LLC and YAHOO! INC.
Not Classified By Court:
In re: YAHOO! INC. CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Appellant:
AARON MILLER
John Demos, Jr. v. Google, Inc., et al
as 19-17541
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNOCO, APPLE, INC., AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr.
Yahoo! Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance
as 19-17462
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YAHOO! INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, a Pennsylvania corporation
Yahoo! Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance
as 19-16475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YAHOO! INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, a Pennsylvania corporation
Rosenow v. Facebook, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01297
Defendant:
Yahoo, Inc. and Facebook, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carsten Rosenow
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2707
Rachel Johnson v. Yahoo! Inc.
as 19-1001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RACHEL JOHNSON, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
YAHOO! INC., now known as OATH HOLDINGS INC
Heavy, Inc. v. Goldman
as 18-910
Petitioner:
Heavy, Inc., Time Inc., Yahoo! Inc. and others
Respondent:
Justin Goldman
Bolar v. Harris et al
as 1:2017cv02972
Plaintiff:
Shelia Mariah Bolar
Defendant:
Shaun L. Harris, K.E. Dean, Iain MacGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
