Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thornburg v. Tantum Companies, LLC
as 3:2020cv00805
Plaintiff:
Ric Thornburg
Defendant:
Tantum Companies, LLC doing business as Back Yard Burgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearson v. Tantum Companies, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00752
Defendant:
Tantum Companies, LLC, Parrish Restaurants, Ltd. and Back Yard Burgers Development, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jan Augusta Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kirkland v. Ingalls Ship Yard et al
as 1:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Johnny Kirkland
Defendant:
Ingalls Ship Yard, John Manville and Fibre Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coyote Logistics, LLC v. Southton Rail Yard, LLC
as 1:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Coyote Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Southton Rail Yard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Harrison County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
Corey Rashad Moore
Defendant:
Harrison County Sheriff's Department and D&D Towe Yard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Ross et al
as 1:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Robert Dewayne Barnes
Defendant:
Unknown Ross, SMCI Yard Officers and SMCI ERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Resolute Burgers, LLC. et al
as 3:2014cv00891
Plaintiff:
Sharnise Banks
Defendant:
Resolute Burgers, LLC. , Back Yard Burgers Development, LLC , Resolute Brands, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Wortham et al v. Ed's Pawn Shop & Salvage Yard et al
as 3:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Wortham , Thomas Wortham, III and Sandra Wortham
Defendant:
Ed's Pawn Shop & Salvage Yard , Bruce Edward Archer , Michael Elliott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. The City of Jackson Impound Yard et al
as 3:2009cv00413
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Larry Harrison
Defendant:
The City of Jackson Impound Yard, Malcolm McMillin, Hinds County Detention Center Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
