Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Yelp Inc. v. Paxton
as 24-581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YELP INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Moreno v. Yelp Inc.
as 3:2023cv04885
Petitioner:
Paul Moreno
Respondent:
Yelp Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Moreno v. Yelp Inc.
as 3:2023cv04569
Plaintiff:
Paul Moreno
Defendant:
Yelp Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Jonathan Sapan v. Yelp Inc.
as 21-80119
Petitioner:
JONATHAN SAPAN, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent:
YELP INC., a Delaware Corporation
Dr. Muhammad Mirza and Allied Medical and Diagnostic Services, LLC v. Yelp, Inc.
as 1:2021mc00621
Plaintiff:
Dr. Muhammad Mirza and Allied Medical and Diagnostic Services, LLC
Defendant:
Yelp Inc.
Dr. Muhammad Mirza and Allied Medical and Diagnostic Services, LLC v. Yelp, Inc.
as 3:2021mc80077
Defendant:
Yelp, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dr. Muhammad Mirza and Allied Medical and Diagnostic Services, LLC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re Dr. Muhammad Mirza et al
as 3:2019mc80146
Not Yet Classified:
Yelp, Inc.
Petitioner:
Dr. Muhammad Mirza and Allied Medical and Diagnostic Services, LLC
Brignac v. Yelp Inc.
as 3:2019cv01188
Defendant:
Yelp Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jaron Brignac and Jaron Lamar Brignac
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
